
Asking if Rafael Devers ought to play first base now that Triston Casas is out for the 12 months is like asking if the solar rises within the east or if the world is spherical. The reply is sure, and anybody who says in any other case has an axe they’d choose to grind than see the Red Sox enhance as a baseball staff. With one exception, they’re not value listening to. Sadly, the exception is Devers himself.
What began as a poor job of communication by new GM-type Craig Breslow within the winter is popping right into a mind-numbing drama in mid-spring, with Devers telling the media about how dangerous this has made him really feel, how onerous shifting to first base could be, and hinting at how little he cares for Breslow. He’s entitled to really feel this fashion, and he’s entitled to make his personal choices primarily based on his place because the staff’s highest-profile finest participant and, nonetheless, its finest hitter:
xwOBA leads since April 1 (getting into at present):
Ohtani (.475)
Alonso (.463)
Choose (.462)
Soto (.439)
Devers (.435)
Tucker (.426)
Machado (.419)
Schwarber (.418)
Ozuna (.418)
Carroll (.416)Devers had 5 dangerous video games to start out the 12 months and since has appeared like one of many sport’s inner-circle elites.
— Alex Speier (@alexspeier.bsky.social) 2025-05-08T19:57:11.114Z
It wouldn’t matter if he was nonetheless hitting .089, both; he’s earned the proper to face his floor. Worse for us, he’s earned the proper to be categorically incorrect, and hoo boy, is he exercising that proper.
Baseball is a bizarre staff sport, in that it’s a person sport trapped in a staff dynamic, nevertheless it is a staff sport, and Devers’ refusal to play first base makes the staff worse. At age 28, he nonetheless appears just like the cherubic teen who burst on the scene as a 20-year-old rookie, however he’s in his ninth MLB season, and infantilizing him by speaking round that reality doesn’t assist anybody. The media circus is one factor; the refusal to just accept what he has turn into (i.e., not a viable third baseman) as a participant, is one other, nevertheless it’s the unwillingness to assist his staff over an anachronistic sense of satisfaction is totally completely different. On this scenario, no person wins.
A good query to ask of me, and I suppose it could be requested, is whether or not I consider his duty to modify positions comes with the gobs of cash he’s making, and I’d in all probability flip that on its head; the one cause he has leverage right here is the size of time he’s scheduled to play in Boston. He has the staff over a barrel. Fringe gamers don’t get fussy about this kind of factor for plainly apparent causes, lest they get shipped out of city. It’s star gamers that find yourself costing their groups wins out of satisfaction much more usually than benchwarmers, and it’s taking place once more.
The perfect instance of this, ever, is arguably within the type of Derek Jeter, whose refusal to go away shortstop for the vastly superior Alex Rodriguez in all probability value the Yankees a shot at a World Series or two (and thanks for that!). Nevertheless it’s not apples to apples. The main, main distinction is that the Yankees nonetheless benefitted in the long run as a result of they nonetheless added A-Rod to the lineup, and Jeter’s stubbornness was handled, logistically, up entrance; A-Rod knew precisely what he was strolling into. It was idiotic, nevertheless it was clear, and all advised, was baseball choice for New York, even when it wasn’t optimized.
Clearly, the Pink Sox had their very own model of this with the Xander Bogaerts scenario, however Bogaerts wasn’t signed to a ceaselessly contract, and his lack of leverage landed him in San Diego. Following the Bogaerts playbook, Deers is digging in his heels and being applauded for it in some corners, and whereas I really like any participant sticking as much as administration in precept, it’s not a one-size-fits all scenario.
It doesn’t match right here. Devers’s solely leverage is his contract, one which he plainly earned and the facility of which he’s free to wield nonetheless he likes. I simply want he wouldn’t do it in essentially the most self-defeating approach doable, nor do I believe he ought to be praised for exercising his leverage in a misguided approach in a misbegotten present of solidarity. Nobody is best off this fashion, least of all him. His says his teammates have his again, which I consider. My query is: Why doesn’t he have theirs?
Trending Merchandise